<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sands Communications &#187; Word nerdishness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sandscommunications.com/archives/category/writing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sandscommunications.com</link>
	<description>writing, editing, proofreading and web design services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Preventing apostrophe abuse</title>
		<link>http://sandscommunications.com/archives/269</link>
		<comments>http://sandscommunications.com/archives/269#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vsands</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Wall of Why: English Anguish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word nerdishness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punctuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandscommunications.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">It's a danger that reaches into every aspect of modern communication: <em>apostrophe abuse</em>. Every day, thousands of innocent apostrophes vanish, leaving the words where they lived bereft of meaning. They're not even safe at Amazon.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-313 aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid black; margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px;" title="Et tu, Amazon?" src="http://sandscommunications.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/amazon3.jpg" alt="Amber alert! Small apostrophe taken from title" width="335" height="97" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">When they <em>do</em> turn up, they're typically enslaved into the service of some inappropriate word. Witness the well-meaning "it's" used as a possessive, as in "an apostrophe worth it<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s weight in gold." Oh, the humanity.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Equally as disturbing is the random appearance of these humble punctuation marks in places an apostrophe should never go -- the dark, dank underbelly of words that are neither possessives nor contractions. "We have dictionary<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s for sale!" (Don't try that at home.) Makes me wonder if perhaps there's been an appropriation for apostrophes in the president's new stimulus package, and now we have to use them up. (Hey, why not? It includes funding for a butterfly garden in Florida -- why can't they back a few apostrophes? Commas, however, may be excessive.)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Enough of the abuse. Apostrophes, unite and proclaim your simple truths:</p>

<span id="more-269"></span>
<ul>
	<li>Aside from the possessive kind (you know who you are), <strong>an apostrophe is just a placeholder </strong>for a letter or two that, for simplicity's sake or dialect, has been left out.
<ul>
	<li> "Can't" is just "cannot," where the apostrophe stands in for "no."</li>
	<li> "Isn't" is just "is not" with an apostrophe instead of an "o."</li>
	<li> "This post's crazy" has an apostrophe marking the absence of an "i" in "post is."</li>
	<li> "Ain't" is...well, I don't care what the dictionary says about common usage. It ain't a word.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Apostrophes do NOT (or at least, <em>should</em> not) indicate plurals of anything.</strong>
<ul>
	<li>"Way too many mention<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s of apostrophe<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s in this post" is just wrong, on so many levels.</li>
	<li>Same with "$20 million dollar<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s for the removal of small- to medium-sized fish passage barrier<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s" (from the original stimulus package, by the way).</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>In the case of possessives, think of that little arc as a hand trying to hang onto something -- <em>owning</em> it.</strong>
<ul>
	<li>"Florida's butterfly park"</li>
	<li>"Our nation's mounting debt"</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;">Next time you feel compelled to abuse an apostrophe, stop. Get ahold of yourself. Look bravely in the mirror and say to yourself:</p>

<ul>
	<li><strong>"Can I take away the apostrophe and still make sense without additional words?"</strong> If the answer's "yes," STEP AWAY FROM THE APOSTROPHE. It's probably trying to be too possessive, in which case <em>you</em> are being abused by <em>it</em>.</li>
	<li><strong>"If I stick an 'i' in for the apostrophe in 'it's,' does the sentence make sense?" </strong>If so, leave that lovely little curl where it is. It's a placeholder. It's -- "it is" -- keeping the t and the s from blurring into some nonsensical possessive mush ("its"), which, in a perverse turn of the English language, also can be a possessive <em>without</em> an apostrophe. Hence all the confusion.</li>
	<li><strong>"If in doubt, leave it out."</strong> That's pretty much <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_BRITAIN_NO_APOSTROPHE?SITE=FLDAY&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT" target="_blank">what the British government has decided</a>, for better or worse.</li>
</ul>
As always, if you have a grammar or punctuation dilemma, please feel free to post it in the comments. I'll (as in, "I will") do my best to help.<!--more-->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">It's a danger that reaches into every aspect of modern communication: <em>apostrophe abuse</em>. Every day, thousands of innocent apostrophes vanish, leaving the words where they lived bereft of meaning. They're not even safe at Amazon.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-313 aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid black; margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px;" title="Et tu, Amazon?" src="http://sandscommunications.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/amazon3.jpg" alt="Amber alert! Small apostrophe taken from title" width="335" height="97" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">When they <em>do</em> turn up, they're typically enslaved into the service of some inappropriate word. Witness the well-meaning "it's" used as a possessive, as in "an apostrophe worth it<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s weight in gold." Oh, the humanity.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Equally as disturbing is the random appearance of these humble punctuation marks in places an apostrophe should never go -- the dark, dank underbelly of words that are neither possessives nor contractions. "We have dictionary<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s for sale!" (Don't try that at home.) Makes me wonder if perhaps there's been an appropriation for apostrophes in the president's new stimulus package, and now we have to use them up. (Hey, why not? It includes funding for a butterfly garden in Florida -- why can't they back a few apostrophes? Commas, however, may be excessive.)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Enough of the abuse. Apostrophes, unite and proclaim your simple truths:</p>

<span id="more-269"></span>
<ul>
	<li>Aside from the possessive kind (you know who you are), <strong>an apostrophe is just a placeholder </strong>for a letter or two that, for simplicity's sake or dialect, has been left out.
<ul>
	<li> "Can't" is just "cannot," where the apostrophe stands in for "no."</li>
	<li> "Isn't" is just "is not" with an apostrophe instead of an "o."</li>
	<li> "This post's crazy" has an apostrophe marking the absence of an "i" in "post is."</li>
	<li> "Ain't" is...well, I don't care what the dictionary says about common usage. It ain't a word.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Apostrophes do NOT (or at least, <em>should</em> not) indicate plurals of anything.</strong>
<ul>
	<li>"Way too many mention<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s of apostrophe<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s in this post" is just wrong, on so many levels.</li>
	<li>Same with "$20 million dollar<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s for the removal of small- to medium-sized fish passage barrier<span style="color: #ff0000;">'</span>s" (from the original stimulus package, by the way).</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>In the case of possessives, think of that little arc as a hand trying to hang onto something -- <em>owning</em> it.</strong>
<ul>
	<li>"Florida's butterfly park"</li>
	<li>"Our nation's mounting debt"</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;">Next time you feel compelled to abuse an apostrophe, stop. Get ahold of yourself. Look bravely in the mirror and say to yourself:</p>

<ul>
	<li><strong>"Can I take away the apostrophe and still make sense without additional words?"</strong> If the answer's "yes," STEP AWAY FROM THE APOSTROPHE. It's probably trying to be too possessive, in which case <em>you</em> are being abused by <em>it</em>.</li>
	<li><strong>"If I stick an 'i' in for the apostrophe in 'it's,' does the sentence make sense?" </strong>If so, leave that lovely little curl where it is. It's a placeholder. It's -- "it is" -- keeping the t and the s from blurring into some nonsensical possessive mush ("its"), which, in a perverse turn of the English language, also can be a possessive <em>without</em> an apostrophe. Hence all the confusion.</li>
	<li><strong>"If in doubt, leave it out."</strong> That's pretty much <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_BRITAIN_NO_APOSTROPHE?SITE=FLDAY&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT" target="_blank">what the British government has decided</a>, for better or worse.</li>
</ul>
As always, if you have a grammar or punctuation dilemma, please feel free to post it in the comments. I'll (as in, "I will") do my best to help.<!--more-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandscommunications.com/archives/269/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Moronic Monday!</title>
		<link>http://sandscommunications.com/archives/246</link>
		<comments>http://sandscommunications.com/archives/246#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vsands</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Wall of Why: English Anguish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word nerdishness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mistakes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandscommunications.com/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monday is blah. Monday is blue. Monday is the perfect day for complaining. So... Every Monday (time permitting), I will whine, criticize and otherwise carry on about some grammar or spelling goof that makes me crazy. It might be something I spotted recently or just one of those common, irritating errors that the nuns at St. Margaret's Elementary slapped out of me.

<span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><em>[Disclaimer: Nobody's perfect. I make mistakes, too. But just for fun, let's pretend I don't.]
</em></span></span>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="size-full wp-image-249 aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid black; margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px;" title="I can make a different!" src="http://sandscommunications.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/misspelling1-312x138-custom.png" alt="Yes, we can!" width="312" height="138" />Today's goof comes from syracuse.com, an affiliate of Syracuse's <em>Post-Standard</em>. Given that the site draws more than 58,000 visitors per month -- and represents a metro-area newspaper that boasts a new $40 million press hall -- you'd think the peeps over there would be staffed to the gills with copyeditors and proofreaders. Maybe <em>that</em> would make a <em>difference</em>.</p>

They need me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Monday is blah. Monday is blue. Monday is the perfect day for complaining. So... Every Monday (time permitting), I will whine, criticize and otherwise carry on about some grammar or spelling goof that makes me crazy. It might be something I spotted recently or just one of those common, irritating errors that the nuns at St. Margaret's Elementary slapped out of me.

<span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><em>[Disclaimer: Nobody's perfect. I make mistakes, too. But just for fun, let's pretend I don't.]
</em></span></span>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="size-full wp-image-249 aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid black; margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px;" title="I can make a different!" src="http://sandscommunications.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/misspelling1-312x138-custom.png" alt="Yes, we can!" width="312" height="138" />Today's goof comes from syracuse.com, an affiliate of Syracuse's <em>Post-Standard</em>. Given that the site draws more than 58,000 visitors per month -- and represents a metro-area newspaper that boasts a new $40 million press hall -- you'd think the peeps over there would be staffed to the gills with copyeditors and proofreaders. Maybe <em>that</em> would make a <em>difference</em>.</p>

They need me.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandscommunications.com/archives/246/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
